Comments on: Ethics in journalism and the Metcalfe law http://bhavin.directi.com/ethics-in-journalism-and-the-metcalfe-law/ Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:17:23 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Bhavin Turakhia http://bhavin.directi.com/ethics-in-journalism-and-the-metcalfe-law/comment-page-1/#comment-218 Bhavin Turakhia Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:02:56 +0000 http://bhavin.directi.com/?p=52#comment-218 @Sil: We never removed any comment that was appearing on that article. Nevertheless I have informed my sales team to connect with you to clarify @Sil: We never removed any comment that was appearing on that article. Nevertheless I have informed my sales team to connect with you to clarify

]]> By: SiL http://bhavin.directi.com/ethics-in-journalism-and-the-metcalfe-law/comment-page-1/#comment-217 SiL Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:24:48 +0000 http://bhavin.directi.com/?p=52#comment-217 I notice that you removed my comment on your other blog [http://blog.directi.com/company/our-official-response-to-malicious-reports-which-falsely-implicate-the-directi-group/] which made specific mention of precisely the lack of action that these journalists are referring to. It used to appear just below the comment which ends "Good Luck DirectI!". That is not very transparent of you, and negates your argument regarding "ethics in journalism", since you apparently think it's just fine to delete any mention which actually provides quantifiable proof of the claims these stories have made. I'd also like to acknowledge that you do appear to be taking action (via separate email correspondence.) However this selective removal of any dissent on your part is troubling. As such I've sent an archive of it to several authorities. SiL / IKS / concerned citizen I notice that you removed my comment on your other blog [http://blog.directi.com/company/our-official-response-to-malicious-reports-which-falsely-implicate-the-directi-group/] which made specific mention of precisely the lack of action that these journalists are referring to.

It used to appear just below the comment which ends “Good Luck DirectI!”.

That is not very transparent of you, and negates your argument regarding “ethics in journalism”, since you apparently think it’s just fine to delete any mention which actually provides quantifiable proof of the claims these stories have made.

I’d also like to acknowledge that you do appear to be taking action (via separate email correspondence.) However this selective removal of any dissent on your part is troubling. As such I’ve sent an archive of it to several authorities.

SiL / IKS / concerned citizen

]]>