4 Feb, 2009

Introduction of New TLDs will NOT increase costs for Trademark Holders

Posted by

As an ICANN accredited Registrar, a consultant to Registrars and Registries, and an erstwhile chair of the Registrars Constituency, I am very closely involved with the ICANN bottoms up consensus processes. Amongst the most interesting endeavors of ICANN, and a fundamental element of ICANN’s goal is the creation of new gTLDs. Some of the recent comments on the new gTLD applicant guidebook seem to suggest that creation of new gTLDs will result in a cost increase to existing trademark holders who will have to register their trademark in various TLDs as a defensive mechanism.

Paul Stahura published a great report demonstrating that trademark holders have historically not been blocking their names across multiple Top-Level Domains (TLDs). I have always been a fan of number crunching—”numbers never lie”.

Since Paul has already done a remarkable job of statistical analysis, I am going to wear my theorist hat and prove a reworded form of the Hypothesis using logical deduction and common sense.

Hypothesis – Introduction of new TLDs will not increase the sum total registration cost that trademark holders need to spend on domain names.

Methodology – Logical deduction.

Fact:
There are currently over 280 TLDs of which a little over 250 are ccTLDs in the IANA root zone.

Assumptions:
Individuals and companies spend money for economic gain. Therefore whether a registrant is an organization, a speculator, a cyber squatter, or a phisher, their purpose in registering a domain name is to derive economic gain that outweighs the cost of the domain name.

Description:
Let us start by analyzing why one would want to register a domain name in each additional TLD outside of the primary TLD that they use for their business. Lets take the example of a company—Extra Cautious Inc.—who uses the domain name extracautious.com. They now need to evaluate whether it makes sense for them to register the string extracautious in other TLDs. Here is the reasoning that the CFO of Extra Cautious Inc. would go through.

Traffic expectation:
It makes sense for the CFO to register extracautious.biz or extracautious.info in case an adequate number of people are expected to type in extracautious.biz in their browser directly. The number of type-ins needed to make it worthwhile to register this domain name is negligible given that .biz and .info domains cost substantially under $10 per year. If there is a clear traffic value to be derived, then as Paul has pointed out in his elaborate report, the registration of this additional domain name is not a cost but rather a revenue generation opportunity for Extra Cautious Inc, who otherwise would have missed out on the hits. Therefore in case of a Traffic Expectancy the hypothesis above holds true.

Source of traffic:
A typical website gets traffic in two ways. Either through direct type-ins, or via hyperlinks. Both the former and the latter are primarily a function of the domain name that an organization promotes. When Extra Cautious Inc. promotes extracautious.com as its website on its stationery, advertising etc., it expects people to type in that domain name to reach their website. It also expects search engines to index that domain name, and other directories and websites to link to that domain name. In other words traffic through type-ins and hyperlinks would directly end up on their website.

Next let’s explore the possibility of direct type-in traffic on other TLDs. Users on the Internet type-in a domain name directly if they expect to find the website or information they were looking for. The most common case of this is appending a .com to a company/product name. It is common behavior on the Internet to append a “.com” to the end of a company name to look for its website. In some cases people even append a .net or a .org. However, given Google magic, that is the limit of a user’s patience. One does not have to be Einstein to conclude that no users are trying out 280+ TLD combinations to get to a company’s website. It can therefore be assumed that if 50 new TLDs, each quite different sounding from the other, were to be launched, that users on the internet would not begin to iterate through those 50 TLDs to find a company.

ccTLDs type-ins:
In fact the only other type of domain that tends to get type-in traffic is ccTLD equivalents. This is based on two behavior patterns. Users seeking for a company that they know is based in India, could try to reach that company’s website by appending “.in” to the company name as a last resort after attempting a .com / .net / .org search. Similarly, users from India, who are used to seeing “.in” domains may append “.in” to a company name (e.g. dell.in) to find its local website. By this logic, many companies should ideally have registered their domain names in several ccTLDs, especially those of highly populated countries like India and China. Yet the TLD Zones of these ccTLDs have little overlap with the global trademark registry as well as with the .com zone, barring generics and some fortune 500 companies.

Many new TLDs have a specific purpose:
Add to this the fact that many of the proposed new TLDs have varying creative purposes. We have heard of business models such as .wiki, .blog etc. which have such specific purposes. Type-in traffic on those TLDs for a specific trademark such as Extra Cautious Inc, is highly unlikely, since users would not expect Extra Cautious’ website to be available at extracautious.wiki.

No traffic expectation:
Going back to our first point—in case no one is expected to type in extracautious.newTLD, it makes little sense for Extra Cautious Inc. themselves to register extracautious.newTLD. This for instance applies to specific TLDs like .aero. Since extracautious is in the business of making fireworks ;) … they do not expect any of their existing or potential customers to type in extracautious.aero. Similarly since Extra Cautious Inc. largely operates in the US, it may block extracautious.us but chooses not to block extracautious.in. The likelihood of individuals typing in extracautious.biz and extracautious.info ad-hoc is ZERO so they do not need to block those domains. If there is a traffic expectancy on any TLD option, it is a no brainer to block those domains since the potential revenue would outweigh the cost.

What about cybersquatters:
The next argument typically made by IP constituencies is that if a speculator / cybersquatter / phisher were to register extracautious.newTLD then they could create nuisance value and the company may be prompted to block their domain name (defensive registrations) to prevent this nuisance value.

It is important to understand that CyberSquatters / Speculators / Phishers register non-generic trademark domain names for specific economic reasons. Let’s explore these.

Type-in traffic on trademark names:
If a trademarked domain gets type-in traffic, a speculator maybe prompted to register this domain to monetize the traffic. However in this case, as we have discussed before, a trademark holder themselves would wish to register it prior to a speculator since the revenue outweighs the cost. If a speculator can earn more than the cost of the domain name by simply monetizing traffic to that domain name, then it is assumed that the actual trademark holder can earn significantly higher revenue and therefore is not bearing any cost by registering his domain name in that TLD. Therefore Extra Cautious Inc. chooses to register extracautious.au since it has an office in Australia and expects type-in traffic from Australia. This is not an extra cost for them since through this additional domain they get traffic that they would have otherwise not received.

Defensive domain registrations to prevent misrepresentation or blackmail:
Some folks argue that even if a domain name has no traffic potential, speculators can choose to register the same to either fraudulently pretend to be the trademark holder (phishing etc.) or otherwise to try and sell the domain name to the trademark holder for a premium. Let’s analyze both these arguments.

Mr Scrupulous registers extracautious.info and puts up a website on it to sell fireworks. He intends to spam thousands of users, pretending to be Extra Cautious Inc. and leverage on the advertising campaign of Extra Cautious Inc. to earn money. It can be argued that if Extra Cautious Inc. had registered their .info domain name this could have been prevented. However this argument is flawed, since Mr. Scrupulous could have registered extracautiousweb.com, extracautiousonline.com, extracautiousfireworks.com, extracautiouscrackers.com, extracautiousoffers.com, extracautiousshop.com and a gazillion other variants within the .com space itself. By this logic the CFO of Extra Cautious Inc. would need to register every combination of extracautious in the .com and .net and .org TLD spaces. Therefore new TLDs are no more expensive than existing TLDs when it comes to protecting one’s trademark from identity theft/phishing. In fact I would go so far as to submit that phishers and spammers would rather register <company&rt;online.com or <company&rt;web.com or some such variant in the .com TLD space in order to commit identity theft, than to register a .info / .biz domain name, since .com domain names are easier to relate to for users. While I have conducted no statistical analysis, gut feeling tells me that one will find more variants of Fortune 500 company brand names in the .com TLD than defensive registrations of those trademarks in all other TLDs.

Let’s take a look at the second argument, wherein Mr. Scrupulous registers extracautious.info with the sole purpose of reselling it to Extra Cautious Inc. for a profit. This has already been covered in our previous assertion. The CFO of Extra Cautious Inc. would only buy extracautious.info at a certain price if the expected profit from the purchase was higher, in which case the purchase does not result in a cost increase. Additionally, Extra Cautious always has the option of filing a dispute, instead of purchasing the domain from Mr. Scrupulous, and this knowledge is by itself sufficient to prevent widespread blackmail of this form. If extracautious.info is getting no traffic, then Extra Cautious Inc. has no reason to purchase extracautious.info either directly or from Mr. Scrupulous

Conclusions:

  • Trademark holders have no reason to register a domain name in a newTLD if the domain name is not going to get any traffic
  • Speculators have no reason to register a domain name in a newTLD if the domain name is not going to get any traffic, since they will be unable to generate revenue from it or sell it to the trademark holder
  • Spammers and phishers have adequate options for registering similar sounding domain names in existing TLDs without having to bother with new TLDs
  • Thus, it can be concluded that the Introduction of new TLDs is not increasing the sum total registration cost that trademark holders need to spend on domain names
Tags: , , , ,
comment_type == "trackback" || $comment->comment_type == "pingback" || ereg("", $comment->comment_content) || ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>

Trackbacks & Pingbacks
  • Comment by Abhijiet on February 26, 2009 @ 9:00 pm
comment_type == "trackback" || $comment->comment_type == "pingback" || ereg("", $comment->comment_content) || ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>

Trackbacks & Pingbacks
comment_type == "trackback" || $comment->comment_type == "pingback" || ereg("", $comment->comment_content) || ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>

Trackbacks & Pingbacks
  • Comment by sandy on October 20, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
comment_type == "trackback" || $comment->comment_type == "pingback" || ereg("", $comment->comment_content) || ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>

Trackbacks & Pingbacks
  • Comment by The Doctor on November 12, 2009 @ 11:04 am

Comments
comment_type != "trackback" && $comment->comment_type != "pingback" && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content) && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>
Abhijiet
February 26, 2009

I did also thought that introducing new TLD’s would complicate things, thanks for making this article lucid and rich in anecdote.

comment_type != "trackback" && $comment->comment_type != "pingback" && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content) && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>
Nasy Mylanchi
May 7, 2009

Very good article.
Thanks for sharing.
Nasy.

comment_type != "trackback" && $comment->comment_type != "pingback" && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content) && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>
sandy
October 20, 2009

Hello Bhavin

Thanks for excellent post.

I have few doubts about Trademark & Domain Trademark.

this is what my undertanding of trademark :
for example if I have business name XYZtips and i have taken trademark for name XYZsports which manufacture sports related stuff and i alos have domain XYZsports.com so in that case no one can start business with my name for sports products.

But when I hold XYZsports.com is it covered by trademark ? as my trademark is limited ” no one can start particular sports product business using my name as any one cat start website XYZsportstips.com or other domains … so do i have to register domain trademark seprately ? ??? so that I can request people who used similar name to surender domain ???

I am not involved in product industry .. but I am really confuse regarding domain trademark and prduct trademark as I have few websites who just provide free information and ranking verywell and now I worried about anytime other people may get trademark for that name and send me notice to surender domain .. is that can happen ??? if i do not have domain trademark or any other trademark ?? I do not sell any product I provide free info on my sites ..

one more issue bothering me is there is one website I have doubt they have trade mark example for XYZTips.com they alos prvide free information and not sell any prducts and i have register domain xyztipsideas.com I alos provide information on same topics with similar name .. now my question is is this create any problem ???? what u will advice me do i need to change domain ? how we can safeguard ourself if domain trademark register after website domain registration ?? how we will come to know any one already hold that trademark see i know US website but they theirself say data may be inaccurate so i think in long run every one will come in problem ??

I am from India and I do not find Indian give have domain trademark policy or related if so then please advice ??

comment_type != "trackback" && $comment->comment_type != "pingback" && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content) && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>
The Doctor
November 12, 2009

Irrelevant in the real world.

This doesn’t factor the aspects of the average ‘net user literacy, standard phishing methods nor business paranoia. Company reputation is something taken incredibly seriously, as right or wrongly, it’s perceived the (legitimate) company’s fault when some idjit falls victim to “bankofamerica-securityaudits.com”.

(See “Abuses” @ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name)

Ignoring the fact many of these so-called “sponsored” TLDs violate the semantic of the Internet, these concepts are pure marketing BS, plain and simple (someone explain to me, what the intended difference is between “.com” & “.biz”). If it’s a question of using “.wiki” or it’s ilk, I’d argue it’s easier to set a sub-domain while also looking less “scattered”.

There’s no need for any further public TLDs/non-ccTLDs than the general .com, .net, .org & sponsored .edu. The 2001-introduced should be culled and the historic roots of TLDs reinstated. I’d even go as far as saying “.com” should be culled, in favor of ccTLDs.

We live in a world where people google Yahoo & use Yahoo to find Google.

ps: sed ‘s/Scrupulous/Unscrupulous/’

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free