<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction of New TLDs will NOT increase costs for Trademark Holders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bhavin.directi.com/introduction-of-new-tlds-will-not-increase-costs-for-trademark-holders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bhavin.directi.com/introduction-of-new-tlds-will-not-increase-costs-for-trademark-holders/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue,  7 Sep 2010 09:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Doctor</title>
		<link>http://bhavin.directi.com/introduction-of-new-tlds-will-not-increase-costs-for-trademark-holders/comment-page-1/#comment-14253</link>
		<dc:creator>The Doctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhavin.directi.com/?p=126#comment-14253</guid>
		<description>Irrelevant in the real world.

This doesn&#039;t factor the aspects of the average &#039;net user literacy, standard phishing methods nor business paranoia. Company reputation is something taken incredibly seriously, as right or wrongly, it&#039;s perceived the (legitimate) company&#039;s fault when some idjit falls victim to &quot;bankofamerica-securityaudits.com&quot;.

(See &quot;Abuses&quot; @ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name)

Ignoring the fact many of these so-called &quot;sponsored&quot; TLDs violate the semantic of the Internet, these concepts are pure marketing BS, plain and simple (someone explain to me, what the intended difference is between &quot;.com&quot; &amp; &quot;.biz&quot;). If it&#039;s a question of using &quot;.wiki&quot; or it&#039;s ilk, I&#039;d argue it&#039;s easier to set a sub-domain while also looking less &quot;scattered&quot;. 

There&#039;s no need for any further public TLDs/non-ccTLDs than the general .com, .net, .org &amp; sponsored .edu. The 2001-introduced should be culled and the historic roots of TLDs reinstated. I&#039;d even go as far as saying &quot;.com&quot; should be culled, in favor of ccTLDs.

We live in a world where people google Yahoo &amp; use Yahoo to find Google.

ps: sed &#039;s/Scrupulous/Unscrupulous/&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irrelevant in the real world.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t factor the aspects of the average &#8216;net user literacy, standard phishing methods nor business paranoia. Company reputation is something taken incredibly seriously, as right or wrongly, it&#8217;s perceived the (legitimate) company&#8217;s fault when some idjit falls victim to &#8220;bankofamerica-securityaudits.com&#8221;.</p>
<p>(See &#8220;Abuses&#8221; @ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name)</p>
<p>Ignoring the fact many of these so-called &#8220;sponsored&#8221; TLDs violate the semantic of the Internet, these concepts are pure marketing BS, plain and simple (someone explain to me, what the intended difference is between &#8220;.com&#8221; &amp; &#8220;.biz&#8221;). If it&#8217;s a question of using &#8220;.wiki&#8221; or it&#8217;s ilk, I&#8217;d argue it&#8217;s easier to set a sub-domain while also looking less &#8220;scattered&#8221;. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s no need for any further public TLDs/non-ccTLDs than the general .com, .net, .org &amp; sponsored .edu. The 2001-introduced should be culled and the historic roots of TLDs reinstated. I&#8217;d even go as far as saying &#8220;.com&#8221; should be culled, in favor of ccTLDs.</p>
<p>We live in a world where people google Yahoo &amp; use Yahoo to find Google.</p>
<p>ps: sed &#8217;s/Scrupulous/Unscrupulous/&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandy</title>
		<link>http://bhavin.directi.com/introduction-of-new-tlds-will-not-increase-costs-for-trademark-holders/comment-page-1/#comment-13612</link>
		<dc:creator>sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhavin.directi.com/?p=126#comment-13612</guid>
		<description>Hello Bhavin 

Thanks for excellent post. 

I have few doubts about Trademark &amp; Domain Trademark. 

this is what my undertanding of trademark : 
for example if I have business name  XYZtips  and i have taken trademark for name XYZsports which manufacture sports related stuff and i alos have domain XYZsports.com so in that case no one can start business with my name for sports products. 

But when I hold XYZsports.com is it covered by trademark ? as my trademark is limited &quot; no one can start particular sports product business using my name as any one cat start website XYZsportstips.com  or other domains ... so do i have to register domain trademark seprately ?  ???   so that I can request people who used similar name to surender domain ???  


I am not involved in product industry .. but I am really confuse regarding domain trademark and prduct trademark as I have few websites who just provide free information and ranking verywell and now I worried about anytime other people may get trademark for that name and send me notice to surender domain  .. is that can happen ???   if i do not have domain trademark or any other trademark ??  I do not sell any product I provide free info on my sites .. 

one more issue bothering me is there is one website I have doubt they have trade mark  example for XYZTips.com they alos prvide free information and not sell any prducts and i have register domain xyztipsideas.com  I alos provide information on same topics with similar name .. now my question is is this create any problem ????  what u will advice me do i need to change domain ?  how we can safeguard ourself if domain trademark register after website domain registration  ?? how we will come to know any one already hold that trademark see i know US website but they theirself say data may be inaccurate so i think in long run every one will come in problem ??  

I am from India and I do not find  Indian give have domain trademark policy or related if so then please advice ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bhavin </p>
<p>Thanks for excellent post. </p>
<p>I have few doubts about Trademark &amp; Domain Trademark. </p>
<p>this is what my undertanding of trademark :<br />
for example if I have business name  XYZtips  and i have taken trademark for name XYZsports which manufacture sports related stuff and i alos have domain XYZsports.com so in that case no one can start business with my name for sports products. </p>
<p>But when I hold XYZsports.com is it covered by trademark ? as my trademark is limited &#8221; no one can start particular sports product business using my name as any one cat start website XYZsportstips.com  or other domains &#8230; so do i have to register domain trademark seprately ?  ???   so that I can request people who used similar name to surender domain ???  </p>
<p>I am not involved in product industry .. but I am really confuse regarding domain trademark and prduct trademark as I have few websites who just provide free information and ranking verywell and now I worried about anytime other people may get trademark for that name and send me notice to surender domain  .. is that can happen ???   if i do not have domain trademark or any other trademark ??  I do not sell any product I provide free info on my sites .. </p>
<p>one more issue bothering me is there is one website I have doubt they have trade mark  example for XYZTips.com they alos prvide free information and not sell any prducts and i have register domain xyztipsideas.com  I alos provide information on same topics with similar name .. now my question is is this create any problem ????  what u will advice me do i need to change domain ?  how we can safeguard ourself if domain trademark register after website domain registration  ?? how we will come to know any one already hold that trademark see i know US website but they theirself say data may be inaccurate so i think in long run every one will come in problem ??  </p>
<p>I am from India and I do not find  Indian give have domain trademark policy or related if so then please advice ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasy Mylanchi</title>
		<link>http://bhavin.directi.com/introduction-of-new-tlds-will-not-increase-costs-for-trademark-holders/comment-page-1/#comment-6031</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasy Mylanchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhavin.directi.com/?p=126#comment-6031</guid>
		<description>Very good article.
Thanks for sharing.
Nasy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article.<br />
Thanks for sharing.<br />
Nasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhijiet</title>
		<link>http://bhavin.directi.com/introduction-of-new-tlds-will-not-increase-costs-for-trademark-holders/comment-page-1/#comment-3759</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhijiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhavin.directi.com/?p=126#comment-3759</guid>
		<description>I did also thought that introducing new TLD&#039;s would complicate things, thanks for making this article lucid and rich in anecdote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did also thought that introducing new TLD&#8217;s would complicate things, thanks for making this article lucid and rich in anecdote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

